https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/15254020/naked-ramblers-cause-outrage-stripping-off-yards-from-school/
You can't believe everything you read, I have been on this walk before and they strip off out of sight of the school and the pub and were very careful to dress before getting near the village so as not to upset anyone. This article cannot be true because you definitely cannot be seen in the field where they stripped off. the woman must have followed them out of the village to where they stripped off. This group is very careful not to upset anyone especially as it is such a small village. Once on the walk it is very unusual to meet anyone and people are asked to dress even when passing a building hundreds of yards away.
Given the hysterical quotes attributed to the woman who took the pictures, it isn't hard to believe she did exactly as you've suggested, plus, you know, it's The Sun.
As ever The Sun does not let facts get in the way of a story designed to titillate and enrage at the same time. We shouldn't forget how Sun reporters hid behind gravestones at the funerals of Hillsborough victims, and its part in phone hacking. Pleasing though to see that its circulation has fallen from more than three million to just 500,000 and owner Murdoch has revalued it at zero financially.
@somerset - like all print media, "circulation" figures are an outdated measure as it refers to physical product when most media consumption is now electronic and online. While internet page viewing figures are difficult to come by they're also unreliable as a guide to what people read and whether they actually read it - but I suspect the Sun online is seen by many more than the printed Sun is or ever was.
Noli illegitimi te carborundum
@somerset - like all print media, "circulation" figures are an outdated measure as it refers to physical product when most media consumption is now electronic and online. While internet page viewing figures are difficult to come by they're also unreliable as a guide to what people read and whether they actually read it - but I suspect the Sun online is seen by many more than the printed Sun is or ever was.
Circulation figures were never that meaningful but the fact remains that Murdoch now values the title at zero. That's the most telling thing.
There should be no expectation of fairness, balance, logic or even truth from the media – that isn't how money is made. Balanced information is boring and often takes a lot of effort to understand. What you get from the media is entertainment. Plus, the human body is a favourite for the marketing business - so expect to see lots of controversy about nudity. It isn't the media's business to inform or be honest. I personally think that's reprehensible, but that's the way things will stay as long as the majority are happy to pay for it.
Unlike the original sun, the newspaper provides heat, but rarely, illumination.
I wouldn't even be sure that what was sent to the sun wasn't rewritten by a "reporter" to make a "better" story